Message Forum: Re: who to vote for

Re: who to vote for

Posted By: shadowfax, on host 4.4.184.77
Date: Saturday, October 14, 2000, at 20:02:18
In Reply To: Re: who to vote for posted by eric sleator on Saturday, October 14, 2000, at 14:44:25:

> > We have Pat Buchannan, who's currently running radio ads advocating a heavy dose of religion in the federal government, and bashing gays.
>
> What do you mean "bashing gays"? What's he saying?

I am going to totally butcher the quote here because i've heard the ad all of two times, but it was something along the lines of being angry that homosexuals are allowed to live among us. That kind of lovely sentiment.

>
> -eric sleator
> Sat 14 Oct A.D. 2000

Replies To This Message

Re: who to vote for - Faux Pas - Sun, 10/15/2000, 18:51:22
- Re: who to vote for - eric sleator - Sun, 10/15/2000, 19:58:06
  - Re: who to vote for - Sam - Sun, 10/15/2000, 20:28:26
    - Re: who to vote for - Trip - Fri, 10/20/2000, 11:20:38
      - Re: who to vote for - gabby - Sat, 10/21/2000, 17:56:24
      - Re: who to vote for - Speedball - Fri, 10/20/2000, 15:36:47
        
        Re: who to vote for - unipeg - Fri, 10/20/2000, 16:26:37
        
        Christian? - Ticia - Sat, 10/21/2000, 14:07:45
      - Re: who to vote for - Wolfspirit - Fri, 10/20/2000, 11:25:16
        
        Re: style of argument - Trip - Fri, 10/20/2000, 12:10:25
        
        Re: style of argument - Sam - Fri, 10/20/2000, 12:55:20
    - Being protective the problem? - koalamom - Wed, 10/18/2000, 19:17:30
      - Re: Being protective the problem? - Brunnen-G - Wed, 10/18/2000, 23:30:39
    - Re: who to vote for - Kelly - Mon, 10/16/2000, 16:48:15
      - Not here to condemn, but to urge self-control. - Wolfspirit - Fri, 10/20/2000, 11:39:28
        
        Re: Not here to condemn, but to urge self-control. - eric sleator - Tue, 10/31/2000, 19:10:27
        
        Re: 'righteous' actions... - Wolfspirit - Tue, 10/31/2000, 20:24:10
        
        Re: 'righteous' actions... - Brunnen-G - Tue, 10/31/2000, 22:10:03
        
        Re: not here to condemn ;0 - Wolfspirit - Wed, 11/1/2000, 17:57:14
        
        Re: Not here to condemn, but to urge self-control. - Ellmyruh - Fri, 10/20/2000, 12:29:03
        
        Re: Not here to condemn, but to urge self-control. - gabby - Sat, 10/21/2000, 17:47:01
        
        Re: Not here to condemn, but to urge self-control. - Faux Pas - Tue, 10/24/2000, 09:09:38
        
        Re: Not here to condemn, etc. Not punctual, either. - gabby - Wed, 11/1/2000, 19:48:49
        
        Re: Not here to condemn, but to urge self-control. - Brunnen-G - Mon, 10/23/2000, 00:35:36
        
        Re: Not here to condemn, but to urge self-control. - Trip - Sun, 10/22/2000, 11:30:21
        
        Re: Not here to condemn, but to urge self-control. - gabby - Mon, 10/23/2000, 17:24:08
        
        Re: Not here to condemn Genetics again, Ellmyruh;) - Wolfspirit - Wed, 11/1/2000, 20:28:04
        
        Re: Not here to condemn, but to urge self-control. - Ellmyruh - Sun, 10/22/2000, 20:46:59
      - Re: who to vote for - eric sleator - Mon, 10/16/2000, 23:54:02
        
        Re: who to vote for - Sam - Tue, 10/17/2000, 06:46:11
        
        Re: who to vote for - eric sleator - Tue, 10/17/2000, 18:55:31
        
        Re: who to vote for - Sam - Wed, 10/18/2000, 06:34:03
        
        Re: who to vote for - Nyperold - Wed, 10/18/2000, 07:34:35
        
        Speaking of versions - Wolfspirit - Wed, 10/18/2000, 14:02:04
        
        Re: Speaking of versions - Nyperold - Wed, 10/18/2000, 14:14:35
        
        Re: Speaking of versions - [Spacebar] - Wed, 10/18/2000, 14:53:54
        
        Re: Speaking of versions - Nyperold - Wed, 10/18/2000, 15:57:42
      - Re: who to vote for - Speedball - Mon, 10/16/2000, 19:33:15
        
        Re: who to vote for, but mostly other stuff now - gabby - Mon, 10/16/2000, 20:33:11
- Re: who to vote for - Howard - Sun, 10/15/2000, 19:12:03