Message Forum: Re: who to vote for

Re: who to vote for

Posted By: eric sleator, on host 64.12.105.183
Date: Saturday, October 14, 2000, at 14:44:25
In Reply To: who to vote for posted by shadowfax on Friday, October 13, 2000, at 22:02:12:

> We have Pat Buchannan, who's currently running radio ads advocating a heavy dose of religion in the federal government, and bashing gays.

What do you mean "bashing gays"? What's he saying?

-eric sleator
Sat 14 Oct A.D. 2000

Replies To This Message

Re: who to vote for - shadowfax - Sat, 10/14/2000, 20:02:18
- Re: who to vote for - Faux Pas - Sun, 10/15/2000, 18:51:22
  - Re: who to vote for - eric sleator - Sun, 10/15/2000, 19:58:06
    - Re: who to vote for - Sam - Sun, 10/15/2000, 20:28:26
      - Re: who to vote for - Trip - Fri, 10/20/2000, 11:20:38
        
        Re: who to vote for - gabby - Sat, 10/21/2000, 17:56:24
        
        Re: who to vote for - Speedball - Fri, 10/20/2000, 15:36:47
        
        Re: who to vote for - unipeg - Fri, 10/20/2000, 16:26:37
        
        Christian? - Ticia - Sat, 10/21/2000, 14:07:45
        
        Re: who to vote for - Wolfspirit - Fri, 10/20/2000, 11:25:16
        
        Re: style of argument - Trip - Fri, 10/20/2000, 12:10:25
        
        Re: style of argument - Sam - Fri, 10/20/2000, 12:55:20
      - Being protective the problem? - koalamom - Wed, 10/18/2000, 19:17:30
        
        Re: Being protective the problem? - Brunnen-G - Wed, 10/18/2000, 23:30:39
      - Re: who to vote for - Kelly - Mon, 10/16/2000, 16:48:15
        
        Not here to condemn, but to urge self-control. - Wolfspirit - Fri, 10/20/2000, 11:39:28
        
        Re: Not here to condemn, but to urge self-control. - eric sleator - Tue, 10/31/2000, 19:10:27
        
        Re: 'righteous' actions... - Wolfspirit - Tue, 10/31/2000, 20:24:10
        
        Re: 'righteous' actions... - Brunnen-G - Tue, 10/31/2000, 22:10:03
        
        Re: not here to condemn ;0 - Wolfspirit - Wed, 11/1/2000, 17:57:14
        
        Re: Not here to condemn, but to urge self-control. - Ellmyruh - Fri, 10/20/2000, 12:29:03
        
        Re: Not here to condemn, but to urge self-control. - gabby - Sat, 10/21/2000, 17:47:01
        
        Re: Not here to condemn, but to urge self-control. - Faux Pas - Tue, 10/24/2000, 09:09:38
        
        Re: Not here to condemn, etc. Not punctual, either. - gabby - Wed, 11/1/2000, 19:48:49
        
        Re: Not here to condemn, but to urge self-control. - Brunnen-G - Mon, 10/23/2000, 00:35:36
        
        Re: Not here to condemn, but to urge self-control. - Trip - Sun, 10/22/2000, 11:30:21
        
        Re: Not here to condemn, but to urge self-control. - gabby - Mon, 10/23/2000, 17:24:08
        
        Re: Not here to condemn Genetics again, Ellmyruh;) - Wolfspirit - Wed, 11/1/2000, 20:28:04
        
        Re: Not here to condemn, but to urge self-control. - Ellmyruh - Sun, 10/22/2000, 20:46:59
        
        Re: who to vote for - eric sleator - Mon, 10/16/2000, 23:54:02
        
        Re: who to vote for - Sam - Tue, 10/17/2000, 06:46:11
        
        Re: who to vote for - eric sleator - Tue, 10/17/2000, 18:55:31
        
        Re: who to vote for - Sam - Wed, 10/18/2000, 06:34:03
        
        Re: who to vote for - Nyperold - Wed, 10/18/2000, 07:34:35
        
        Speaking of versions - Wolfspirit - Wed, 10/18/2000, 14:02:04
        
        Re: Speaking of versions - Nyperold - Wed, 10/18/2000, 14:14:35
        
        Re: Speaking of versions - [Spacebar] - Wed, 10/18/2000, 14:53:54
        
        Re: Speaking of versions - Nyperold - Wed, 10/18/2000, 15:57:42
        
        Re: who to vote for - Speedball - Mon, 10/16/2000, 19:33:15
        
        Re: who to vote for, but mostly other stuff now - gabby - Mon, 10/16/2000, 20:33:11
  - Re: who to vote for - Howard - Sun, 10/15/2000, 19:12:03