Message Forum: Re: IIRC/response

Re: IIRC/response

Posted By: LaZorra, on host 67.142.130.40
Date: Thursday, May 11, 2006, at 14:54:46
In Reply To: Re: IIRC/response posted by Gharlane on Thursday, May 11, 2006, at 13:07:10:

>Experiment: You need to have the phenomenon or materials ready to hand. The results need to be repeatable, so you need enough of what you're studying to do it again.

This is why I take issue with people who claim that evolution is a "more scientific" theory than creationism. Neither is repeatable, and until scientists can duplicate evolution (building amino acids doesn't count) or God makes another life-supporting planet, it's a matter of what an individual finds to be accurate in his own eyes.

Way off topic, I know, but I felt compelled to stand up for what's been indirectly pooh-poohed in the rest of this thread.

La"Sorry if this opens up that can of worms, Sam"Zorra

Replies To This Message

Re: IIRC/response - Stephen - Thu, 5/11/2006, 15:07:50
- Re: IIRC/response - LaZorra - Thu, 5/11/2006, 15:57:17
  - Re: IIRC/response - LaZorra - Thu, 5/11/2006, 21:48:25
    - Re: IIRC/response - wintermute - Fri, 5/12/2006, 07:02:02
      - Re: IIRC/response - daniel78 - Fri, 5/12/2006, 11:48:46
        
        Re: IIRC/response - wintermute - Fri, 5/12/2006, 18:12:02
        
        Re: IIRC/response - Dave - Fri, 5/12/2006, 12:03:50
    - Re: IIRC/response - Dave - Fri, 5/12/2006, 01:16:03
    - Re: IIRC/response - daniel78 - Fri, 5/12/2006, 00:45:36
      - Re: IIRC/response - Stephen - Fri, 5/12/2006, 01:48:54
      - Re: IIRC/response - Dave - Fri, 5/12/2006, 01:21:50
        
        Re: IIRC/response - Stephen - Fri, 5/12/2006, 01:53:12
        
        Re: IIRC/response - Dave - Fri, 5/12/2006, 02:48:32
      - Re: IIRC/response - Carrie - Fri, 5/12/2006, 00:59:39
    - Re: IIRC/response - Carrie - Fri, 5/12/2006, 00:33:36
  - Re: Science - gremlinn - Thu, 5/11/2006, 19:17:02
  - Re: IIRC/response - Dave - Thu, 5/11/2006, 18:45:15
    - Re: IIRC/response - Darien - Thu, 5/11/2006, 19:31:56
      - Re: IIRC/response - Sam - Thu, 5/11/2006, 22:10:14
        
        Re: IIRC/response - Dave - Fri, 5/12/2006, 16:25:32
        
        Re: IIRC/response - Sam - Fri, 5/12/2006, 16:59:26
        
        Re: IIRC/response - Dave - Fri, 5/12/2006, 19:21:13
        
        Re: IIRC/response - Darien - Thu, 5/11/2006, 23:33:37
        
        Re: IIRC/response - Sam - Fri, 5/12/2006, 10:38:09
        
        Re: IIRC/response - gremlinn - Fri, 5/12/2006, 16:11:40
        
        Re: IIRC/response - Sam - Fri, 5/12/2006, 16:28:55
        
        Re: IIRC/response - gremlinn - Fri, 5/12/2006, 17:32:27
        
        Re: IIRC/response - Sam - Fri, 5/12/2006, 18:52:12
        
        Re: IIRC/response - gremlinn - Fri, 5/12/2006, 20:20:29
        
        Re: IIRC/response - Dave - Fri, 5/12/2006, 16:35:50
        
        Re: IIRC/response - Stephen - Fri, 5/12/2006, 12:13:38
        
        Re: IIRC/response - Sam - Fri, 5/12/2006, 12:20:01
        
        Re: IIRC/response - Darien - Fri, 5/12/2006, 15:44:19
      - Re: IIRC/response - Dave - Thu, 5/11/2006, 19:46:41
        
        Re: IIRC/response - Darien - Thu, 5/11/2006, 20:09:56
        
        Re: IIRC/response - Dave - Fri, 5/12/2006, 02:58:01
        
        Re: IIRC/response - Darien - Fri, 5/12/2006, 03:02:08
        
        Re: IIRC/response - gremlinn - Thu, 5/11/2006, 20:47:26

Post a Reply

RinkChat Username:
Password:
Email:		(optional)
Subject:
Message:	> >Experiment: You need to have the phenomenon or materials ready to hand. The results need to be repeatable, so you need enough of what you're studying to do it again. > > This is why I take issue with people who claim that evolution is a "more scientific" theory than creationism. Neither is repeatable, and until scientists can duplicate evolution (building amino acids doesn't count) or God makes another life-supporting planet, it's a matter of what an individual finds to be accurate in his own eyes. > > Way off topic, I know, but I felt compelled to stand up for what's been indirectly pooh-poohed in the rest of this thread. > > La"Sorry if this opens up that can of worms, Sam"Zorra
Link URL:		(optional)
Link Title:		(optional)

Make sure you read our message forum policy before posting.