> I don't dispute your last points.

Do you like how I jumped into this with such an unassailable position as, "It's important not to underestimate or overestimate"? I find you can always win debates with an argument that, by its very definition, people would be wrong to disagree with.

Later, in chat, Dave called me on it. I was hoping to see how far I could go with that, next time posting something like, "I support not being wrong."

In any case, by virtue of the fact that my stance in this thread is so unequivocally correct, I pronounce myself the winner of the debate.