> the fundamental problem with the theodical question is that it presumes a situation
> in which man can judge God - or, even more basically, a situation in which God can be
> defined by (and therefore restricted by) human terms and ideas. God is, as theologians are
> wont to say, "wholly other." Man does not and *cannot* understand God.

That sounds like an argument against organised religion to me.

If God is wholly other and we *cannot* understand him, what are we to make of all these people in funny hats who claim to know what God is like?

Paul