Main      Site Guide    
Message Forum
Re: Name associations (Who started it?)
Posted By: Sakura, on host 64.12.105.37
Date: Thursday, June 21, 2001, at 07:48:24
In Reply To: Re: Name associations posted by Arthur on Wednesday, June 20, 2001, at 22:36:07:

> > > Okay, so it may not qualify as "starting a thread" since it was an offshoot of a different thread and I didn't retitle it, but I *was* the first one to mention all this name stuff and get this whole big demented ball rolling, so I figure I get at least ten percent credit. :)
> >
> > Well, if you want to get technical, I think Dave gets credit, too. When I was thinking about Jezzika's response, I did a search in the forum to see if the topic had already been discussed. I skimmed the posts I found, and then decided to start a new thread.
> >
> > Ell"Too technical"myruh
>
> Okay. Ellmyruh gets 40% credit for writing the root post, Jezzika gets 40% credit for writing the post that directly inspired the root post, Dave gets 15% credit because he wrote the post from before that helped inspire the root post, and I get 5% credit for making the offhand comment that inspired it this particular thread. (I was thinking of giving myself 10% before but then I decided I didn't have enough seniority.)
>
> That's ignoring the 100% extra credit that goes to Sam for giving us a forum to have the thread in, plus a bonus 5% for bringing the whole who-started-the-thread thing into question in the first place. :) (I get 2% for making mention of it, though.)
>
> That Sam... always giving 105%...
>
> Ar"Everything fair now?"thur


Of course, had you not had a tendency to write long posts, then there would have been nothing for Jezzika to comment on. Also, htaeD started the death penalty thread, giving you occasion to post long posts.

Saku[complicater of issues]ra

Replies To This Message