Main      Site Guide    
Message Forum
Re: Lost in Space
Posted By: Darien, on host 207.10.37.2
Date: Friday, October 9, 1998, at 12:21:00
In Reply To: Re: Lost in Space posted by Dave on Friday, October 9, 1998, at 11:05:55:

> > I guess I just reason differently from everyone
> >else - I see the spaceship's acceleration as the
> >catalyst in this situation, acting upon the
> >static universe to create an odd effect.
> >
> > Am I just dumb, or do you see what I mean? Or
> >neither?
> >
>
> I wouldn't say you're dumb, but for me it just comes back to Occam's razor (until I get a better understanding of the principle, that is.) Which is it simpler to imagine? The ship does something that effects the ship, or the ship does something that effects the entire rest of the universe? Do you still disagree?

I do understand, but for my money it's easier for the ship to affect the universe. Hear me out - the universe is static. The ship is active. The active force acts upon the static environment, no?

Replies To This Message