Re: James Bond movies and their affect on the universe.
Quartz, on host 63.64.161.72
Saturday, February 3, 2001, at 12:57:47
Re: James Bond movies and their affect on the universe. posted by Jessica on Saturday, February 3, 2001, at 12:45:13:
> Heheh....a kindred spirit when it comes to Bond films, at last! I got really into Bond last year. You're the only person who I know who agrees with my Bond opinions! Sean COnnery always seemed too arrogant, which may be Bond's personality, but I wasn't charmed. Roger Moore is much nicer and more attractive. But yeah Pierce is the best--he's the best-lookin', and he's very rico suave. Timothy Dalton looks like his face is molded from clay. > > The guy who was in one movie was a good transition from Connery to Moore. In his movie, Bond falls in love, gets married, and his wife gets snuffed by a baddie. So Moore's Bond is a more sensitive Bond than Connery, having had his heart broken (sigh!). > > When I lived in London, I was a few miles from Pinewood Studios, where the Bond films were made. My boyfriend's brother worked there, so I got a tour. He told me he once saw Sean Connery, and that he looked like an old man in person. Which makes sense. > > --Jez"Ivana Peelemov, Colorado secret agent"zika > >
The funny thing is (and I mean funny ODD), is that I'm not even into James Bond THAT much. I love spy movies but not James Bond movies, for some reason. View To A Kill is good though.
Quartz, Agent 005 and Jedi Knight. And I'm a WRITER, too! ~~*Q*~~
|