> > I wouldn't take that particular page any more seriously than the anti-Gore pages. Both have
> > an agenda. The only good way to figure out the truth of things is to invest some time in getting
> > news from a variety of different reliable sources. Take pages with obvious agendas, one
> > way or the other, with a grain of salt.
>
> I'd be interested to know what you think is the agenda of the page I gave the link to...
>
> Paul

Persuading that Gore is "not that bad a guy, really."

Actually, I expect that they correctly verified/debunked most of the quotes. It should be noted, however, that the page contains none of the recent rash that the media has been excitedly pointing out. [OK, mostly Limbaugh, followed grudgingly by the major networks.]

Bush does seem to mistake a lot of words, but I'd be interested to see what percentage of his daily words are in error. Being on the campaign trail, he probably says way too many each day. Gore seems to be shooting himself in the foot inexplicably with his weird lies. My personal favorite is the one where he claimed to have raised 10,000 chickens. Why on earth would he feel the need to say that?

gab"posting too much to this thread"by