Re: Why violins are better
Mel, on host 209.180.201.250
Monday, December 20, 1999, at 22:21:53
Re: Why violins are better posted by Fobulis on Monday, December 20, 1999, at 21:18:42:
> > > They are high > Is it really desirable to have every canine within a 50-mile radius drawn to one's practice sessions? > > > They dont cost much > Yes, but the cardboard models are not generally acceptable in the concert setting. > > > They are small > Darn you. Darn you to heck. Although I am always suspicious of handbag-sized instruments - say, piccolos... > > > They get all the melody > Do not. In fact, there's a whole measure in one piece where they don't even play... > > > They have the spot to the right > Yep, violas are front and center, where we belong. > > > They are really high > Again, is this a good thing? > > > They are not low > I begin to pick up on some redundancy. Also some repetitiveness. > > > The D string is cool > I prefer G strings. > > > They are cheap > So was yo' mama. > > > They are easy to learn > So was yo' mama. > > > They are easy to tune > So was... never mind. > > > They are not very low > I get the funny feeling I've read this before. > > > On the "A" string it sounds really cool<
Oooh...there's another violist here! Are you new?
-M"if so, Welcome"el
|